“Corporation between people with different backgrounds can cost trouble. The sharing can be misunderstood and you may insult a tradition due to the prospect of the coexisting borders by globalisation.”
(Robert Veilis, 2013)
“Due to this risk, people intent to find solutions, which
respects the traditions of cultures and the conviction of different topics in
nation states,” Robert told me. He whereas to the United Nations (UN) that relates to the
fifth of Merrill and Fischer’s (1970: 126) areas: 'intergovernmental and financial international communication'(elucidates Rantanen, 2005:2).
Robert is my farther. He has travelled around the World
when he was a kid, but also due to his job as a grownup in the UN.
The biggest change due to globalization in his life is the
cultural and physical flows. These flows costed a lot of lives in
the war of the Baltic; the Baltic population suddenly realized the cultural
difference between one another and got scared without a leader to unite them.
Rapidly the urge to patriotism and racism was dominant and UN went in, trying
to restore peace.
My father’s believe in the ideology of human rights, made
him a part of an intercultural communication (Asante and Gudykunst 1989: 9).
Due to globalization and therefore the regionalization, he made a difference in
many people’s lives, which is why the said flows are important to him. Today
the many refugees remind him of his history.
His life is clearly influenced by the relations between
national governments and international organisations, and how local happenings
influents many people miles away - which confirms Giddens’ definition of
globalization in 1990: ”… as the intensification of world-wide social
relations, which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings
are shaped by events occurring many miles away and vice-versa” (1990: 64). I
was surprised my farther did not mention the media, as this is how the UN and
he were informed.
I guess globalization changes people’s lives
wile blurring the nation state. In this case UN acted as the
good example – though my farther is reminded of the bad ones every day.
ROBERT VEILIS
(Photo by S. Veilis)
Bib:
Giddens, A 1990, `The Consequences of Modernity´Stanford University Press, Stanford, California
Rantanen, T 2005, ‘Theorizing media
globalization’, The media and globalization, Sage, London
“Corporation between people with different backgrounds can cost trouble. The sharing can be misunderstood and you may insult a tradition due to the prospect of the coexisting borders by globalisation.”
(Robert Veilis, 2013)
“Due to this risk, people intent to find solutions, which
respects the traditions of cultures and the conviction of different topics in
nation states,” Robert told me. He whereas to the United Nations (UN) that relates to the
fifth of Merrill and Fischer’s (1970: 126) areas: 'intergovernmental and financial international communication'(elucidates Rantanen, 2005:2).
Robert is my farther. He has travelled around the World
when he was a kid, but also due to his job as a grownup in the UN.
The biggest change due to globalization in his life is the
cultural and physical flows. These flows costed a lot of lives in
the war of the Baltic; the Baltic population suddenly realized the cultural
difference between one another and got scared without a leader to unite them.
Rapidly the urge to patriotism and racism was dominant and UN went in, trying
to restore peace.
My father’s believe in the ideology of human rights, made
him a part of an intercultural communication (Asante and Gudykunst 1989: 9).
Due to globalization and therefore the regionalization, he made a difference in
many people’s lives, which is why the said flows are important to him. Today
the many refugees remind him of his history.
His life is clearly influenced by the relations between
national governments and international organisations, and how local happenings
influents many people miles away - which confirms Giddens’ definition of
globalization in 1990: ”… as the intensification of world-wide social
relations, which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings
are shaped by events occurring many miles away and vice-versa” (1990: 64). I
was surprised my farther did not mention the media, as this is how the UN and
he were informed.
I guess globalization changes people’s lives
wile blurring the nation state. In this case UN acted as the
good example – though my farther is reminded of the bad ones every day.
 |
| ROBERT VEILIS (Photo by S. Veilis) |
Bib:
Giddens, A 1990, `The Consequences of Modernity´Stanford University Press, Stanford, California
Rantanen, T 2005, ‘Theorizing media globalization’, The media and globalization, Sage, London
